Reasonable Salah al-Bardawil VS Coward Moussa Abu Marzouk: Two faces of Hamas

Signs of sharp division are appearing in Hamas’ top ranks as the fighting in Gaza intensifies and as cease-fire talks between the Palestinian militant group and Israel, brokered by Egypt, reach a critical point.

Gaza-based Hamas officials have sounded more willing in recent days to consider a deal for a temporary cease-fire, being pushed by Egypt, even though the proposal would leave Israeli troops on the ground in Gaza temporarily and keep Gaza’s borders sealed short term. But Hamas political officials, close to the group’s leadership in exile in Syria, have characterized a cease-fire as still far away.

The differences became sharp Thursday and late Wednesday: One key Hamas official from inside Gaza, Gazi Hamad, told the BBC that he was optimistic the cease-fire being worked on in Egypt could be reached, “because I think there is no other choice for us.”

Salah al-Bardawil, another Hamas official from Gaza, stopped short of saying the militants had accepted the Egyptian proposal for a 10-day cease-fire but told reporters, “We hope that this Egyptian effort will succeed.”

But a top Hamas spokesman in Syria, Moussa Abu Marzouk, told The Associated Press on Thursday that Hamas would not abandon its demand that Israel withdraw its troops from Gaza and open border crossings before any cease-fire, even a temporary one.

Another top Hamas figure linked to the leadership-in-exile in Syria, Osama Hamdan, based in Beirut, stressed late Wednesday that Hamas had not agreed to some points of the Egypt plan.

Israeli intelligence assessments have repeatedly suggested differences emerging between the Syria and Gaza wings of the movement.

Such a rift would benefit Israel because it suggests the on-the-ground Hamas people in Gaza — bearing the brunt of the offensive by Israel’s army — are leaning toward a political compromise to end the offensive. Israel’s strategy is to damage Hamas and hope that leads to compromises by Palestinians inside Gaza, and leads to an end to Hamas rocket firing at southern Israel.

Egyptian officials also have suggested there are Hamas rifts, which would benefit Egypt’s efforts to push Hamas to accept a deal with Israel.

Hamas, however, has denied any internal divisions and has accused Israel of spreading such reports as psychological warfare. The tougher tone from Syrian-based officials could be merely a negotiating tactic.

The group’s official structure complicates the picture. Hamas insists it makes decisions through a consensus process among an estimated 50 members of the secretive Shura Council who live both inside and outside Gaza and the West Bank.

But the members rarely meet because of travel restrictions and security concerns, and observers note it would be near-impossible for such a big group to make fast decisions.

In practice, Hamas’ most powerful official is widely thought to be Khaled Mashaal, the Syrian-based political leader. Mashaal is considered a hard-liner who consults frequently with Syrian and Iranian officials. Top Tehran officials have visited Damascus frequently throughout the Israeli offensive on Gaza.

Mashaal has repeatedly called for the militant group to fight on despite more than 1,000 deaths during the Israeli offensive.

Mashaal’s power lies in the fact that he controls the group’s purse strings and funnels money as he chooses — much of it thought to come from Iran — to individual Hamas leaders, inside both Gaza and the West Bank. Gaza Hamas leaders in particular depend almost entirely on outside money because the territory’s borders are sealed.

Privately, however, some officials in Gaza say the rising casualties — and the severe hardships caused by Israel’s offensive — have put new pressure on Hamas leaders inside Gaza to find a way to end the fighting.

One Gaza official told The Associated Press on Thursday that many in Gaza are increasingly anxious for fighting to end. He spoke on condition of anonymity because talks are ongoing.

Israel intensified its offensive Thursday, in an apparent effort to ratchet up pressure on Hamas to accept a deal. Israeli tanks shelled downtown Gaza City as ground troops thrust deep into a crowded neighborhood for the first time, sending terrified residents fleeing for cover. Israeli shells also struck the U.N. headquarters in the Gaza Strip.

Even before this week, “the war sparked a strong debate within Hamas over whether we could have avoided this war or not,” said another senior Gaza official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Another sign of the growing Hamas rift is a sharp escalation in the public bickering between two camps of countries in the Mid-east.

Egypt and Saudi Arabia, allies of the United States, are pushing Hamas to agree to cease-fire terms. Those moderate Arab governments and others hope a Hamas rift could steer the Hamas leadership in Syria away from Iran and Syria and help bring Hamas closer to the Arab moderate camp.

But Syria and Iran have been sharply critical of Egypt, Saudi Arabia and others. Iran’s president on Thursday sent a letter to Saudi’s King Abdullah calling on him sharply to do more to defend Hamas and Palestinians and resist Israel.

Iran, however, also seems to be hedging its bets, toning down its rhetoric sporadically in apparent hopes of keeping open the possibility of U.S. negotiations after U.S. President-elect Barrack Obama takes office next week.

 

Associated Press writer Sam F. Ghattas in Beirut, Lebanon contributed to this report

Advertisements

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s