Islam the death of America

Islam will never integrate itself into American culture. The only way that Islam can grow, is to take over America from within.
The British allowed Muslims a voice in their government-and now there are 85 Sharia “kangaroo” courts doling out a 5th century brand of justice to British Muslims. Honor killings are on the rise, violent jihadists protest on England’s street, police services are unable to quell angry violent Muslims rampaging throughout their cities, and ordinary British citizen are imprisoned within their own neighborhoods.
Islamic University prepares to open in Berkeley, California next fall.  Zaytuna College will be the first accredited Muslim college in the United States.
“The college has been hailed as a victory for moderate Islam, a place to promote religious understanding by “blending traditional Islam and American culture and establishing a permanent place for the religion in American society,”
The college’s founders, Hamza Yusuf Hanson and Zaid Shakir; both of whom have already surfaced on the radar as having radical Anti-American and anti-Israeli view.
On September 9, 2001, two days before 9/11, Hanson hollered in Los Angeles, “This country (America) unfortunately has a great, a great tribulation coming to it.  And much of it is already here, yet people are too illiterate to read the writing on the wall
“Hanson described America as “a country that has little to be proud of in its past and less to be proud of in the present.  I am a citizen of this country not by choice but by birth.  I reside in this country not by choice but by conviction in attempting to spread the message of Islam in this country.  I became Muslim in part because I did not believe in the false gods of this society whether we call them Jesus or democracy or the Bill of Rights or any other element of this society that is held sacrosanct by the ill-informed peoples that make up this charade of a society
Every Muslim who is honest would say, I would like to see America become a Muslim country.” Or that Hanson disparagingly called democracy and the Bill of Rights “false gods” in 1996. Given this, to say that Zaytuna College may not be what it seems may be an understatement.

A man who once claimed that he is a citizen of America by birth and not by choice, Hamza Yusuf Hanson (nee Mark Hanson) is an American convert to Islam who, following the attacks of 9/11, softened his incendiary rhetoric. He may have changed his rhetoric, but he hasn’t changed his fundamental beliefs. He

In 1995 Hanson described Judaism as “a most racist religion.”
He has never explicitly denounced Wahhabism or Wahhabi vandalism of religious culture in Saudi Arabia. To many moderate Muslims, if there’s one thing moderate Muslims are defined by, it’s their willingness to censure Wahhabism as radical and dangerous. Hanson and Shakir didn’t respond to numerous requests for an interview.
Daniel Pipes, a well known and widely respected authority about Radical Islam, calls Hanson a master of deceit. Mr. Pipes posed a set of questions for Hanson to answer concerning Islamic radicalization. A test which determines if a Muslim is radical or moderate. Hanson refused to even take the test, and later announced; “I took that test and I failed. And I want to say to all of you, I hope you fail that test too.”
Daniel Pipes test contained these questions:
  • Violence: Do you condone or condemn the Palestinians, Chechens, and Kashmiris who give up their lives to kill enemy civilians? Will you condemn by name as terrorist groups such organizations as Abu Sayyaf, Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya, Groupe Islamique Armée, Hamas, Harakat ul-Mujahidin, Hizbullah, Islamic Jihad, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, and al-Qaida?
  • Modernity: Should Muslim women have equal rights with men (for example, in inheritance shares or court testimony)? Is jihad, meaning a form of warfare, acceptable in today’s world? Do you accept the validity of other religions? Do Muslims have anything to learn from the West?
  • Secularism: Should non-Muslims enjoy completely equal civil rights with Muslims? May Muslims convert to other religions? May Muslim women marry non-Muslim men? Do you accept the laws of a majority non-Muslim government and unreservedly pledge allegiance to that government? Should the state impose religious observance, such as banning food service during Ramadan? When Islamic customs conflict with secular laws (e.g., covering the face for drivers’ license pictures), which should give way?
  • Islamic pluralism: Are Sufis and Shi’ites fully legitimate Muslims? Do you see Muslims who disagree with you as having fallen into unbelief? Is takfir (condemning fellow Muslims with whom one has disagreements as unbelievers) an acceptable practice?
  • Self-criticism: Do you accept the legitimacy of scholarly inquiry into the origins of Islam? Who was responsible for the 9/11 suicide hijackings?
  • Defense against militant Islam: Do you accept enhanced security measures to fight militant Islam, even if this means extra scrutiny of yourself (for example, at airline security)? Do you agree that institutions accused of funding terrorism should be shut down, or do you see this a symptom of bias?
  • Goals in the West: Do you accept that Western countries are majority-Christian and secular or do you seek to transform them into majority-Muslim countries ruled by Islamic law?
Even other Muslims are questioning the validity of  Zaytuna College: “Mahmoud Ayoub, professor of Islamic Studies and Christian-Muslim relations at the Hartford Seminary and a Muslim critic of Zaytuna College, says that any attempt like Zaytuna College should be “studied very carefully so we do not ruin the future of young people who, out of religious enthusiasm, would study at such a place and probably get worthless degrees.” Source

Unite to fight Islamic terrorism stalking Manhattan to Mumbai: Obama

US President Barack Obama Saturday asked nations around the world to come together to solve global problems like a recession, climate change, nuclear proliferation and Islamic terrorism that has claimed innocent lives “from Manhattan to Mumbai”.

It is important to acknowledge no single nation can solve global problems, but working with other nations, the US can lead the way in overcoming these challenges, Obama said in his weekly address after a weeklong trip overseas.
Describing it as a “time when we face tests and trials unlike any we have seen in our time,” the president spoke of “an economic crisis that recognizes no borders. Violent Islamic extremism that’s claimed the lives of innocent men, women, and children from Manhattan to Mumbai”.

“An unsustainable dependence on Arab oil and other sources of energy that pollute our air and water and threaten our planet. The proliferation of the world’s most dangerous weapons, the persistence of deadly disease, and the recurrence of age-old conflicts,” he said listing the challenges.

“These are challenges that no single nation, no matter how powerful, can confront alone. The United States must lead the way. But our best chance to solve these unprecedented problems comes from acting in concert with other nations,” he said.

That is why he had met with leaders of the G20 nations to ensure that the world’s largest economies take strong and unified action in the face of the global economic crisis, Obama said.

“It is only by working together that we will finally defeat 21st century security threats like Islamic terrorist group like Al Qaeda,” he said.

“Make no mistake: we live in a dangerous world, and we must be strong and vigilant in the face of these threats,” Obama said.

“But let us not allow whatever differences we have with other nations to stop us from coming together around those solutions that are essential to our survival and success.”





Obama sent envelopes containing HIV-infected blood

hiv-p1220314Saad Hussein, a Muslim Ethiopian refugee from President Obama’s hometown of Chicago has been arrested for allegedly sending Obama and his staff envelopes containing HIV-infected blood, in the hopes of killing or harming them.

It’s only the second time ever that HIV-infected blood has been sent with malicious intent through the U.S. mail system, a spokesman for the U.S. Postal Inspection Service said.


In the weeks leading up to Obama’s inauguration, Saad Hussein, an Ethiopian refugee in his late 20s, sent an envelope addressed to “Barack Obama” to offices of the Illinois government in Springfield, Ill., according to court documents. 

The envelope contained a series of curious items, including a letter with reddish stains and an admission ticket for Obama’s election-night celebration in Chicago’s Grant Park. Court documents said Hussein, who takes drugs to treat a mental illness, later told FBI agents he is “very sick with HIV” and cut his fingers with a razor so he could bleed on the letter.

Hazmat teams were called in after the envelope was opened, and offices of the Illinois Department on Aging and the Department of Revenue were locked down for nearly two hours, locking 300 staffers in their offices, court documents said.

Hussein, with his brother acting as an interpreter, told FBI agents he was actually “an admirer” of Obama and was “seeking help from the government,” according to court documents. He also told them he was hoping to obtain tickets to the Inaugural ceremonies in Washington, the documents said.

Days after sending the letter to Obama, Hussein allegedly placed two more letters in the mail, one addressed to “Emanuel,” an apparent reference to Obama’s current Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel. The two letters contained what appeared to be dried blood, the court documents said.

Hussein, who has never held a job in the three years he’s been in the United States, was arrested last month. He was charged with “knowingly” mailing letters “containing HIV-infected blood, with the intent to kill or injure another,” in violation of federal law.


Mr.Obama: How is US safe when visas are issued from Taliban’s Pakistan?

How is the United States or any other country safe when terrorists can fly from Pakistan freely and when the government of Pakistan will give a clean chit of character for terrorists?  How is the nuclear arsenal any safe in Pakistan where Taliban control more than half of the country? How is the world countries safe when the rogue nuclear scientist A.Q.Khan who openly admitted to selling nuclear secrets to Iran Libya and North Korea?


With the recent Pakistani government’s announcement that they have reached an agreement with the Taliban to allow strict Islamic law, or Sharia, to be implemented in parts of North West Frontier Province and strongly rejecting Washington’s call for tougher measures against militants. Pakistan has formally announced the talibanisation of Pakistan, Pakistan’s previous dealings with the Taliban have only given the fundamentalist Islamic militia time to regroup and gain more ground. Pakistani Taliban gained sway by beheading foreigners as well as local people, burning girl’s schools and attacking US and NATO forces. The Obama administration said that the earlier accord allowed these Islamic terrorists to regroup and rearm and urged Pakistan’s government to concentrate on military solutions to the insurgency in the rugged frontier region, where al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden is believed to be hiding.

This is simply a great surrender, a surrender to a handful of forces who work through rough justice and brute force,” said Athar Minallah, a lawyer and civil rights activist. “Who will be accountable for those hundreds of people who have been massacred in Swat? And they go and recognize these forces as a political force. This is pathetic.”

Speaking in India, President Obama’s special envoy for the region, Richard Holbrooke, said the rise of the Taliban in Swat was a reminder that the U.S., and India face “an enemy which poses direct threats to our leadership, our capitals and our people.”


It marks a major concession by the Pakistani government for Taliban militants who have made significant advances inside the country. The government will recognize sharia for the entire Malakand Division, which includes the Swat district, the chief minister of North West Frontier Province Amir Haider Hoti announced Monday in a news conference. Islamic law is already being practiced in the area, where the Taliban have absolute control.


No More Muslim Immigration (Please sign this petition)

The United States must change its immigration policies to exclude Muslims. Islam is both a religion and a political ideology and its politics are supremacist. That is, the doctrines of mainstream Islam command the followers of this faith to work toward the dominance of their religion over all other religions and the subjugation of all other political systems beneath the Islamic political system (Shari’a). In this sense, Islam seeks to overthrow the established Constitution of the United States, and to replace it with Shari’a. That is sedition.



Mr.Obama: ¿Cómo está seguro EE.UU. cuando se expidan los visados de los talibanes de Pakistán

¿Cómo son los países del mundo de seguridad cuando los terroristas pueden volar desde Pakistán a los EE.UU. o en cualquier otro país libremente cuando el gobierno de Pakistán dará un limpio Chit del carácter de los terroristas? ¿Cómo es el arsenal nuclear de cualquier caja fuerte en Pakistán, donde el control de los talibanes más de la mitad del país? ¿Cómo es el mundo en países seguros cuando la picaresca científico nuclear AQKhan admitió abiertamente que a la venta de secretos nucleares a Libia, Irán y Corea del Norte?

Con el reciente anuncio del gobierno paquistaní que han llegado a un acuerdo con los talibanes para permitir la estricta ley islámica, o Sharia, que se apliquen en partes del noroeste de la Provincia de la Frontera y rechazar enérgicamente la llamada de Washington para medidas más duras contra los militantes. Pakistán ha anunciado oficialmente la talibanisation de Pakistán, Pakistán anteriores relaciones con los talibanes han dado la milicia fundamentalista islámica tiempo para reagruparse y ganar más terreno. Talibanes pakistaníes influencia adquirida por la decapitación de extranjeros, así como la población local, la quema de las escuelas de niñas y atacar a EE.UU. y las fuerzas de la OTAN. La administración de Obama dijo que el anterior acuerdo permite a estos terroristas para reagruparse y rearmarse, y el gobierno de Pakistán instó a concentrarse en las soluciones militares a la insurgencia en la accidentada región fronteriza, donde al-Qaida Osama bin Laden líder que se cree que es la clandestinidad.
Esto es simplemente una gran entrega, una entrega a un puñado de fuerzas que trabajan por la justicia y áspero la fuerza bruta “, dijo Athar Minallah, un abogado y activista de derechos civiles.” ¿Quién será responsable de los cientos de personas que han sido masacrados en matar? Y van y reconocer a estas fuerzas como una fuerza política. Esto es patético “.
Haciendo uso de la palabra en la India, el Presidente Obama del enviado especial para la región, Richard Holbrooke, dijo que el aumento de los talibanes de Swat, en un recordatorio de que los EE.UU., y la India se enfrentan a “un enemigo que plantea amenazas directas a nuestros dirigentes, nuestras capitales y nuestro pueblo. ”

Se trata de una importante concesión por el Gobierno paquistaní para que los militantes talibanes han logrado avances significativos en el interior del país. El gobierno reconocerá la sharia, para toda la División de Malakand, que incluye el distrito de Swat, el primer ministro de la Provincia de la Frontera Noroeste Amir Haider Hoti anunció lunes en una conferencia de prensa. La ley islámica ya se practica en la zona, donde los talibanes tienen el control absoluto.


  Abdul Qadeer Khan, the scientist who helped Pakistan develop nuclear weapons and allegedly leaked atomic secrets to North Korea, Iran and Libya, was freed from years of de facto house arrest Friday by a high court ruling.

The United States, which worries that Iran has used Pakistani know-how in pursuit of nuclear arms, said the disgraced scientist’s release would be “extremely regrettable.”

State Department spokesman Gordon Duguid said Khan remained a “serious proliferation risk.” He said the United States was still trying to confirm Khan’s official status.

On Friday, a smiling Khan emerged from his house in the Pakistani capital and addressed reporters face-to-face for the first time since 2004.


However, he indicated he would not be discussing Pakistan’s atomic bomb program or about who was involved in leaking its secrets around the world.

“We don’t want to talk about the past things,” he said as the guards who have enforced his long isolation stood aside for a throng of TV crews and journalists.

Khan, the architect of Pakistan’s nuclear program, took sole responsibility in 2004 for leaking the nuclear secrets but was immediately pardoned by former President Pervez Musharraf and placed under de facto house arrest. The government insists neither it nor the Pakistani military or Pakistani Intel, ISI, were aware of his activities, which is a blatant lie and which has been proven wrong by most of world’s leading secret services.

Islam – What The West Needs To Know


Famous author Hal Lindsey proclaimed on national television last night that Islam is a violent religion, with many believers becoming more “radical” the more they read the Muslim holy book, the Quran.


“When someone becomes devout and they begin to get really into the Quran and they begin to study what it really teaches, they become what we call a fundamentalist or a radical because the Quran itself and the Hadith teaches violence,” Lindsey said on “Hannity & Colmes” on the Fox News Channel. “There are 109 verses that we sometimes call war verses … these are the verses that the radicals begin to take seriously and they begin to want to overthrow Western civilization.”


Lindsey was a guest on Fox after WorldNet Daily broke a series of stories about the best-selling non-fiction writer who is in a dispute with the Trinity Broadcasting Network over the content of his own twice-weekly Christian commentary program, “The International Intelligence Briefing,” because of what he considers to be efforts to muzzle his opinions about radical Islam.

“After 9-11, I really studied Islam, studied the Quran, studied what they’re teaching and especially why there was a difference between the moderate Muslims and those who were radical,” Lindsey said last night. “I saw that there was a tremendous danger facing this country that many Americans really didn’t seem to be seeing. So I started warning that radical Islam was at war with the United States, and that the threat was as great as any enemy we’d ever faced.”


Folks, we ARE in the midst of a religious war, whether you want there to be one or not. This is the exact same pattern of actions that led to the crusades — the Muslim religion tried to spread itself all over the world like a plague, and the Christians of Europe fought back, defensively, and managed to allow people to be free to choose their own religion. However, the biggest difference is that this time, a large portion of the world is willing to completely submit and convert to Islam, willingly, or at the point of a gun.


Pat Robertson has blasted the religion of Islam during a 1995 taping of The 700 Club, he called the religion a “Christian heresy”. (In fact it is.) On September 19, 2002 episode of FOX News Channel’s Hannity and Colmes, Robertson claimed that the Muslim Prophet Muhammad, was “an absolute wild-eyed fanatic – a robber and a brigand.” (This is historical fact.)


On the July 14, 2005 broadcast of the The 700 Club, he claimed that “Islam, at its core, teaches violence.” On the March 13, 2006 broadcast of The 700 Club Robertson stated that Muslims want global domination and that the outpouring of rage elicited by cartoon drawings of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad ” just shows the kind of people we’re dealing with.


These people are crazed fanatics, and I want to say it now: I believe it’s motivated by demonic power. It is Satanic and it’s time we recognize what we’re dealing with.” He finished by stating “by the way, Islam is not a religion of peace.” This has been proven by endless incidents of Muslim terrorism against almost everyone. But so-called Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, called Robertson’s new comments “grossly irresponsible”. He went on to say, “At a time when inter-religious tensions around the world are at an all-time high, Robertson seems determined to throw gasoline on the fire.” To quote:


ROBERTSON: Imagine one cartoon, one cartoon showing Mohammad with a turban with a missile out of it. I mean, we have stuff like that, that is vastly worse against our politicians all the time. It’s part of free expression. The fact that this elicited this incredible outpouring of rage just shows the kind of people we’re dealing with. These people are crazed fanatics, and I want to say it now: I believe it’s motivated by demonic power; it is satanic; and it’s time we recognize what we are dealing with. But, political correctness will not face one religious ideology with the strength of another because they don’t have the strength of another.


And, so, they’re caving in before this vicious assault, and the goal of Islam, ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, is world domination. These people are saying it over there in Europe — world domination. “We’re going to take over Europe. We’re going to take over England. We’re going to take over Denmark. We’re going to take over France.” That’s their goal! And, why don’t we wake up to the fact of who we’re dealing with? And, by the way, Islam is not a religion of peace.


  • Calendar

    • July 2018
      M T W T F S S
      « Jun    
  • Search